Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Without Rupert Murdoch What Will Become Of Roger Ailes?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 06:06 PM
Original message
Without Rupert Murdoch What Will Become Of Roger Ailes?
http://www.newscorpse.com/ncWP/?p=4881

Without Rupert Murdoch What Will Become Of Roger Ailes?
Posted by Mark on July 13, 2011 at 10:34 am.




snip//

The next Murdoch in line could be Rupert’s daughter, Elisabeth. Prior to this year she was not affiliated with News Corp, but then daddy bought her production company, Shine, and she came along with. Back in the fold, she now has more influence over corporate affairs.

The problem for Ailes is that Elisabeth is not an admirer of Ailes or his politics. She held a fundraiser for Barack Obama when he was a candidate for president in 2008. Her husband, Matthew Freud, told a reporter that…

“I am by no means alone within the family or the company in being ashamed and sickened by Roger Ailes’s horrendous and sustained disregard of the journalistic standards that News Corporation, its founder and every other global media business aspires to.”


Of course now we know that the journalistic standards that News Corp are not particularly high.

snip//

Ailes doesn’t help his own cause either. Just this year he has been involved in incidents that cast his reputation into doubt. Last April he was caught spying on employees of a small-town newspaper he owns in New York. And he used News Corp security to conduct the operations. In February Ailes was implicated in a scheme to deceive federal investigators who were vetting Bernie Kerik’s bid to become the director of Homeland Security. Judith Regan accused Ailes of instructing her to lie to the feds in order to protect Ailes’ pal Rudy Giuliani who was running for president at the time.

As the pillars of News Corp’s ivory tower weaken and crumble, Ailes is going to find himself increasingly beset by rivals and adversaries from within his own ranks. It’s hard to see how he can survive if the current Murdoch hierarchy is deposed. And considering his age and his wealth he may just find it more convenient to retire so that he can spend more time spying on his employees and propping up his dishonest political buddies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Roger's Nixonian plan
http://gawker.com/5814150/
The Idea Behind Fox News Channel Originated in the Nixon White House

"A Plan for Putting the GOP on TV News" (read it here) is an unsigned, undated memo calling for a partisan, pro-GOP news operation to be potentially paid for and run out of the White House. Aimed at sidelining the "censorship" of the liberal mainstream media and delivering prepackaged pro-Nixon news to local television stations, it reads today like a detailed precis for a Fox News prototype. From context provided by other memos, it's apparent that the plan was hatched during the summer of 1970. And though it's not clear who wrote it, the copy provided by the Nixon Library literally has Ailes' handwriting all over it—it appears he was routed the memo by Haldeman and wrote back his enthusiastic endorsement, refinements, and a request to run the project in the margins.


The 15-page plan begins with an acknowledgment that television had emerged as the most powerful news source in large part because "people

http://gawkernet.com/ailesfiles/ailesfiles.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. thanks for that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I've never seen that. THANKS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. It was big news last month
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. One school of thought
There is one school of thought that believes Roger Ailes will simply cease to exist if Murdoch falls, sort of like the tower of Barad Dur in Lord of the Rings collapsed when the power of Sauron was broken. Another school of thought holds that Roger Ailes would immediately revert to a prior incarnation, and scholars are divided over whether that would be a dung beetle or a slime mold. There is general agreement that it would be disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. The biggest losers will be the
ReTHUGS - I can't wait.

Senator Lautenberg said it is possible that Murdoch has already broken Federal laws if those bribery allegations are proven.
Please, please, please!!
This is the biggest media scandal in memory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. !
:rofl:
Love the lotr analogy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. Standard Repub reason
He wanted to spend more time with his family money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muntrv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. Calling Roger Ailes a hut is an insult to huts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. sports commissioner
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. For what
Jacks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC