Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Robert Reich: The President’s Jobs Plan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
FourScore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 10:58 PM
Original message
Robert Reich: The President’s Jobs Plan
Edited on Wed Jul-13-11 11:13 PM by FourScore
The President’s Jobs Plan (Not)
Author: Robert Reich · July 13th, 2011

...My first priority is to get Americans back to work. I’m proposing a jobs plan that will do that.

First, we’ll exempt the first $20,000 of income from payroll taxes for the next two years. This will put cash directly into American’s pockets and boost consumer spending. We’ll make up the revenue shortfall by applying Social Security taxes to incomes over $500,000.

Second, we’ll recreate the WPA and Civilian Conservation Corps — two of the most successful job innovations of the New Deal – and put people back to work directly. The long-term unemployed will help rebuild our roads and bridges, ports and levees, and provide needed services in our schools and hospitals. Young people who can’t find jobs will reclaim and improve our national parklands, restore urban parks and public spaces, recycle products and materials, and insulate public buildings and homes.

Third, we’ll enlarge the Earned Income Tax Credit so lower-income Americans have more purchasing power.

Fourth, we’ll lend money to cash-strapped state and local governments so they can rehire teachers, fire fighters, police officers, and others who provide needed public services. This isn’t a bailout. When the economy improves, scheduled federal outlays to these states and locales will drop by an amount necessary to recover the loans...

http://www.economonitor.com/blog/2011/07/the-president%E2%80%99s-jobs-plan-not/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FourScore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Really?? Not a single rec? Is it a dupe? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
2.  I couldn't tell what it was from the OP, you need to read the link. HEre is a little bit
more:



"To call this inadequate would be a gross understatement.

Here’s what the President should have said:

This job recession shows no sign of ending. It can no longer be blamed on supply-side disruptions from Japan, Europe’s debt crisis, high oil prices, or bad weather.

We’re in a vicious cycle where consumers won’t buy more because they’re scared of losing their jobs and their pay is dropping. And businesses won’t hire because they don’t have enough customers.

Here in Washington, we’ve been wasting time in a game of chicken over raising the debt ceiling. Republicans want you to believe the deficit is responsible for the bad economy. The truth is that when the private sector cannot and will not spend enough to get the economy going, the public sector must step into the breach. Cutting the deficit now would only create more joblessness."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FourScore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. The 4 paragraph rule makes it really hard sometimes. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. YES. In this case you need to go read the whole article. a worthwhile read!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
checks-n-balances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. Reading this broke my heart. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
4. Only if they raise the payroll tax cap too
Otherwise its a lousy idea that funds a stimulus by borrowing from the SS trust fund. Not an unworkable idea, but I think the risk outweighs the benefit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blecht Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
6. Robert Reich for President!
At least he should be in the current administration instead of the people who caused this mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 02:23 AM
Response to Original message
8. but gosh darn it, the Republican House would never pass it
so there's no point to even proposing it. Much better to propose a tax cut tilted upwards which they will pass than to actually try for something progressive, isn't it? :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC