Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Must Read -Down Memory lane with Newt Gingrich, Murdoch and Mother Jones

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 08:42 AM
Original message
Must Read -Down Memory lane with Newt Gingrich, Murdoch and Mother Jones
May/June 1995 Issue

What did Rupert Murdoch want for his $4.5 million investment in Newt Gingrich? The tycoon's past dealings shed some light.

Consistency may be the hobgoblin of small minds--or the result of finding something that works. Take Rupert Murdoch's publishing house, HarperCollins. Not only does the venture make a gratifying amount of money selling books, but evidence suggests that it serves another, less visible function.

For example, HarperCollins sees fit to pay millions of dollars to Jeffrey Archer (former leader of the British conservatives and an influential member of the House of Lords) for novels many critics find of dubious quality. HarperCollins also advanced Margaret Thatcher $5.4 million for her almost unreadable memoirs, and is rumored to have given Deng Xiaoping's daughter, Deng "Maomao" Rong, a cool million for a book the New Yorker described as "a turgid, barely literate piece of propaganda." And finally, HarperCollins ignited a political firestorm when it attempted to give Newt Gingrich $4.5 million for his ruminations on the American political scene.
http://motherjones.com/politics/1995/05/publisher-powerful
<snip>

What do Britain, China, and the United States have in common? In each, Murdoch's enterprises have faced daunting regulatory and political obstacles. In England, Thatcher and her Tories allowed him to buy the London Times without a review from the Monopolies Commission. He also bought a half-interest and control of Britain's only satellite television service, despite the fact that Thatcher's own home secretary found the deal "not technically legal." In China, the politburo recently attempted to ban satellite dishes, which would make Murdoch's STAR TV signal inaccessible to the Chinese; with the ruler's daughter a new member of the HarperCollins' millionaire club, however, things may change. And in the U.S., where Murdoch's Fox TV network is under scrutiny for illegal foreign ownership, the Gingrich connection is of more than passing interest. (Fox's parent company, News Corporation Ltd., is owned by Murdoch's family trust, an Australian entity.)

In December of last year, Newt's literary agent, Lynn Chu, and HarperCollins announced a $2 million book deal for the speaker-to-be. Less than two weeks earlier, Gingrich and Murdoch had their now-famous November 28 meeting--and admitted to touching on the latter's regulatory difficulties--but both denied knowing there was a book deal in the works. Exploded one literary agent, "Chu had a deal going and she didn't tell her own client? That's almost impossible to believe." As for Murdoch, his attention to detail in all his business operations is legendary. As one News Corp. exec says, "If someone mops a floor at one of Murdoch's enterprises, Rupert knows what's in the bucket."

--------------
The shite is going to hit the fan! Was Newt the original Grifter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. The swamp is being drained and what is in there will be very interesting
The Saudi is the second largest shareholder of News Corp. Some may be worried.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. They should be - did you see the BBC interview
with the Saudi in chief shareholder?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. no I didn't
what did he say
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Mostly that he is all about
ethics and standards :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC