Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The real worker to retiree ratio is much higher, because workers are 80% more productive!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 07:26 PM
Original message
The real worker to retiree ratio is much higher, because workers are 80% more productive!
You've almost certainly heard of the changing ratio between workers to retirees.

Right now it's 2.8 workers to one retiree, in non-relative terms. However, if you take into account that the average worker now works 80% more efficiently than they used to, you can find that the real efficiency based ratio is 5.2 workers to one retiree. I say workers, because it's almost as if we've got a work force that's 80% larger than the real numbers indicate, for no other reason than they work so fucking hard!

But there's a problem. These efficiency increases have not been rewarded, at least the middle class and poor haven't been properly rewarded.

That's because income that would usually have fallen into the realm of the FICA taxes has gone to people who pay no FICA at all, or very little relative to their income because they make so much money they max out on the taxes (in other words they've hit the cap.)

This is the real reason we are facing any problems with Social Security and Medicare, at least as far as revenues are concerned. (Costs may be increasing in Medicare because of high inflation in the medical sector.)

Because of the fact that workers now work so much harder, we don't actually have as much burden to take care of retirees.

That monkey your back is not grandma, it's Daddy Warbucks. You're carrying his lazy ass around while you're 80% more productive than you used to be!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
badtoworse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. You have a point, albeit an irrelevant one
The funding mechanism for SS is what it is. That's the hand we got dealt and it's unlikely to change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. I am loving your last sentence.
Edited on Sat Jul-30-11 08:49 PM by truedelphi
That monkey on your back is not grandma, it's Daddy Warbucks. You're carrying his lazy ass around while you're 80% more productive than you used to be!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC