Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FDL: To End the Debt Ceiling Crisis, Reagan and Clinton Would Have Invoked the 14th

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 05:31 PM
Original message
FDL: To End the Debt Ceiling Crisis, Reagan and Clinton Would Have Invoked the 14th
To End Debt Ceiling Crisis, Reagan and Clinton Would’ve Invoked the 14th


snip

....when children throw temper tantrums, grown-ups put them in timeout — they don’t appease them with candy.

The President seems to hold Ronald Reagan in esteem, but it’s very difficult to imagine Reagan allowing a Democratic House to hold the government hostage for months on end and threaten to send the US economy over a cliff. I’m not saying I admire Reagan for firing the air traffic controllers, or that it was the right thing to do, but he acted decisively and had public opinion on his side. And in doing so, he advanced an ideological goal of his party.

Bill Clinton, who is on record as saying he’d invoke the 14th, did not cave when Gingrich threw his temper tantrum – and the public rewarded him with a second term. He, too, made his stand on ideological grounds.

As with the case of the health care bill and the stimulus, Obama has allowed Congress to dictate the terms — and neither turned out well. Of course, this manufactured debt ceiling crisis is worse, since he’s allowed the opposing party to do so, even though they control only the House. In effect, he’s made the Tea Party caucus of the House the de facto president....

snip

http://firedoglake.com/


Granted, it's difficult to prove a counterfactual, but it appears Obama had other options. Also, there's no ideology involved in refusing to entertain proposals to "save" Social Security or Medicare, just a grasp of how those programs work and acknowledgement that Social Security is not connected to the debt or deficit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. National Weather Service: Sun will rise in east.
FDL -- I'm shocked. That's out of the box for them.

Of course, if he does it, it'll be 'the executive tap-dancing on the Constitution'.

Just so long as Obama takes a hit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
steve2470 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. better link:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grandrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. fdl a.k.a. teabaggers in disguise?
They would just love to see President Obama impeached! :puke:

Now fdl is calling out.......Ronald Reagan and bash President Obama when he mentions Reagan!:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Can you address the content of the post?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. Firebaggers. LOL...nt
Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. They can read Reagan's dead mind.
:scared: :scared: :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. perhaps an intro course in comp/historical methods would help you understand counterfactual reasonin
g
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. The answer lies in the spin of the wheel nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
21. vaht? it's the ODS... from the firebaggers... vas they... tawkin to meee?
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
8. No doubt The Big Dog would have done what needed to be done to stop this crap.
There's no way he would have EVER even come close to putting SS and Medicare ON THE TABLE....like BO has done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indykatie Donating Member (416 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. I Call BS on FDL Of Course They Think they Know What Clinton and Reagan Would Do
Neither of those those 2 would have found themselves in this position so for anyone to state what they would do so definitively is not a reasonable comment. Odd that Clinton is now painted by many as being both more liberal than he actually was during his presidency and more fearless than Pres. Obama. His policies were as centrist as Obama and though I agreed with many of his policies I haven't forgotten that some were quite conservative. I don't know if Clinton would have put SS and Medicare on the table and neither does anyone else. We ALL know though that he put Medicaid on the table which in my opinion is equal to or maybe even worse than giving up changes to SS and Medicare. That fact though doesn't help the argument from those who wish to paint him in a different and better light than Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. On hindsight Clinton was a dick to say he'd use the 14th in the midst of this nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
10. This is the weakest President I've ever seen.
I only go back to Reagan though. I've never seen anything like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indykatie Donating Member (416 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. You've Never Seen a President so Hated Either
Not sure what you think he can or should do different given the current make up of the House and Senate but you're entitled to your opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. I think Bush was a wee bit more hated there, buddy...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. You must have missed Nixon, he was hated far
more than Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. Wait a minute is he hated or does he have 150% approval from liberals?
Edited on Sun Jul-31-11 07:31 PM by Marr
I forget. It seems to shift according to the argument of the moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. Clinton was more hated.
Whitewater, accusing him of murder and drug dealing. It was more over the top.

What I expect of the president is to fight. I don't necessarily expect him to win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
12. not so sure.. considering our credit rating might be dropped if he did that without any reforms.
that should be the very absolute last resort just prior to defaulting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
17. It's a stupid article because no other President has
faced this problem. ReTHUGS publicly stated that their sole aim is to make Obama fail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
former9thward Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Reagan did face it.
"Unfortunately, Congress consistently brings the Government to the edge of default before facing its responsibility. This brinkmanship threatens the holders of government bonds and those who rely on Social Security and veterans benefits. Interest rates would skyrocket, instability would occur in financial markets, and the Federal deficit would soar. The United States has a special responsibility to itself and the world to meet its obligations. It means we have a well-earned reputation for reliability and credibility -- two things that set us apart from much of the world."

He could not get a clean debt ceiling bill from a Democratic congress in 1987 and default was threatened. http://www.reagan.utexas.edu/archives/speeches/1987/092687a.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidpdx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
23. Fuck FDL, they are a fridge group of loons with their own personal agenda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC