General Discussion

ShazzieB

(16,661 posts)

85. You need to read Ocelot II's posts.

Reply to aggiesal (Reply #52)

Sat Aug 5, 2023, 06:18 PM

Aug 2023

All of them. The title line of the op is not sufficient.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

103 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump's lawyers are now ordered to appear before the court by 5 PM on Monday [View all] Botany Aug 2023 OP

He still has all weekend to whine in public. Lock livetohike Aug 2023 #1

and threaten Evolve Dammit Aug 2023 #62

Citation please. Where was this reported? AZ8theist Aug 2023 #2

this help? Botany Aug 2023 #7

Well, somewhat. AZ8theist Aug 2023 #9

One RT and one like. bluedigger Aug 2023 #10

this help? Botany Aug 2023 #11

Let's hope this order comes to pass. CoopersDad Aug 2023 #3

Try here: Momma Aug 2023 #71

Excellent Picaro Aug 2023 #4

At A Minimum, No Rallies and No Internet nt smb Aug 2023 #24

He has no defense for this GreenWave Aug 2023 #5

Source? Goonch Aug 2023 #6

See reply 2 emulatorloo Aug 2023 #8

Fox News: "Now we're hearing....."? Goonch Aug 2023 #13

Thanks. Also see emulatorloo Aug 2023 #34

Thanks. Also see court doc here: emulatorloo Aug 2023 #35

AP: Chutkan on Saturday gave Trump's legal team until 5 p.m. Monday to respond dalton99a Aug 2023 #12

Trump was ordered not to speak/tweet like he just did on Thursday afternoon and by Friday PM he was Botany Aug 2023 #15

This is all pro forma and is an expected response to Smith's motion Ocelot II Aug 2023 #14

Yes! In the legal jungle why do folks try to navigate without a guide??! For sure this the path!....?? Alexander Of Assyria Aug 2023 #16

Thanks for the explanation! Kaleva Aug 2023 #41

I suspect you meant "WHEN he does it again," though. soldierant Aug 2023 #93

Almost certainly "when." Ocelot II Aug 2023 #95

Justice delayed until Monday or more Tetrachloride Aug 2023 #17

See above posts. This is not a motion to sanction TFG or to change the conditions of his release. Ocelot II Aug 2023 #20

Does this mean only the lawyers? MOMFUDSKI Aug 2023 #18

The lawyers will respond in writing, as per the normal procedure. Ocelot II Aug 2023 #21

Someone is being called to the Principal's office. Never a good thing. n/t aggiesal Aug 2023 #19

No, they aren't. This is a routine motion being handled in a routine manner. Ocelot II Aug 2023 #22

As the screenshot in #11 says, they have to produce a "revised version" of the protective order muriel_volestrangler Aug 2023 #25

Exactly. I don't think there was ever any question that there would be one - Ocelot II Aug 2023 #27

Don't minimize it, he's being called to the Principal's office for something he did. n/t aggiesal Aug 2023 #26

No, he isn't. That might come later, but all this is about Ocelot II Aug 2023 #28

His lawyer represent him. He did something and now the Principal is calling. Don't minimize it. n/t aggiesal Aug 2023 #33

I'm not minimizing it. I'm trying to explain what the process is Ocelot II Aug 2023 #39

Thank you. Nt spooky3 Aug 2023 #48

I only read the title line. You don't need you to explain the process ... aggiesal Aug 2023 #52

You need to read Ocelot II's posts. ShazzieB Aug 2023 #85

No. He is not being called on the carpet. He will not be anywhere near "the carpet." His lawyers 3Hotdogs Aug 2023 #88

Good grief GenThePerservering Aug 2023 #98

Good grief, and you believe I don't understand the process. n/t aggiesal Aug 2023 #99

Man, are you swimming upstream against a strong current of "I can't hear you", or what? jaxexpat Aug 2023 #70

But the motion for protective order included tweets Trump made on 4 August Farmer-Rick Aug 2023 #101

Question nowforever Aug 2023 #23

He's not being called to testify for a routine discovery motion, and he has the same Ocelot II Aug 2023 #31

Coward is the question nowforever Aug 2023 #44

He has a constitutional right not to testify, and that's the only answer he needs to give. Ocelot II Aug 2023 #47

Coward is the question nowforever Aug 2023 #73

If he wants to testify, his lawyers cannot do anything to stop him, it is his right and the Judge Bev54 Aug 2023 #57

If the lawyers know that he will lie - and he surely will - Ocelot II Aug 2023 #72

Are his lawyers smart enough to request a recusal? I hope he insists on testifying Bev54 Aug 2023 #74

It's a withdrawal, not a recusal, but before seeking the court's permission to withdraw Ocelot II Aug 2023 #77

Now that would be fun, I do hope either way they do get cameras in the courtroom. Bev54 Aug 2023 #78

Could he use that strategy to delay the trial more than once? drray23 Aug 2023 #102

I think this judge would recognize it as a delaying tactic and put a stop to it Ocelot II Aug 2023 #103

Coward is the question nowforever Aug 2023 #76

This court hearing is related to Smith's proposed order on confidentiality pnwmom Aug 2023 #29

knew it bigtree Aug 2023 #30

There's no playing or not playing going on. This is all routine, Ocelot II Aug 2023 #32

all that's wasted on me bigtree Aug 2023 #37

This makes sense to me. It's also possible IMO that Jack scipan Aug 2023 #84

Thank you for taking on an attempt to clarify this. MineralMan Aug 2023 #38

Farting in a whirlwind I am, but the law is complicated and often slow, Ocelot II Aug 2023 #43

That's about all I can do. I have no legal background, MineralMan Aug 2023 #45

+1 Amaryllis Aug 2023 #60

Ah... not so much an unwillingness to learn--- Snooper9 Aug 2023 #89

I am amazed at how fast this case is moving. gab13by13 Aug 2023 #55

I generally look for your posts in these matters. I also appreciate your patience likesmountains 52 Aug 2023 #64

You have my thanks also, and... reACTIONary Aug 2023 #97

Agree. Appreciate your continued efforts for clarity. Amaryllis Aug 2023 #61

Replying to my own reply, to clarify and extend MineralMan Aug 2023 #65

Thanks for this explanation. Now that the court dockets are electronic, Ocelot II Aug 2023 #79

My pleasure. Language is my life. MineralMan Aug 2023 #81

Those who doubt OP should report at 6 behind the woodshed! GreenWave Aug 2023 #36

For this thread LetMyPeopleVote Aug 2023 #40

Thanks, LMPV! highplainsdem Aug 2023 #56

This is a man who is never going to STFU until he is forced to. milestogo Aug 2023 #42

TFG's attorneys just filed a motion asking for three more days to respond to protective order LetMyPeopleVote Aug 2023 #46

+1 dalton99a Aug 2023 #49

Oh, FFS. Hope she denies it and tells them to go pound sand. Ocelot II Aug 2023 #50

THIS!!☝️ onetexan Aug 2023 #54

It's a necessary step before she calls him in. Giving them "the talk" about discipling their client. ancianita Aug 2023 #51

The Judge did not even acknowledge the social media post or posts in her order Bev54 Aug 2023 #53

Yeah, we ordinary people would be in jail right now, as we speak. They are sure PatrickforB Aug 2023 #58

Lock him up. republianmushroom Aug 2023 #59

TFG was told by the magistrate in Judge Chutkan's court not to do or say certian things @ 4:00 .... Botany Aug 2023 #68

House arrest, ankle bracelet Warpy Aug 2023 #63

The love of his life Stloperator Aug 2023 #67

Isolation is far, far worse. Warpy Aug 2023 #69

And he is A. bad at it and B. cheats every time he plays. Eliot Rosewater Aug 2023 #90

fine him 1million bucks per violation of stfu order prodigitalson Aug 2023 #91

He will never pay up Warpy Aug 2023 #96

Agree 100% Snackshack Aug 2023 #66

Oh,God this made my day 😂 Naio Aug 2023 #75

So, apparently, it has now been extended to Aug 10 Wonder Why Aug 2023 #80

No, it hasn't. This is just TFG's motion *asking* the deadline to be moved to 8/10. Ocelot II Aug 2023 #82

Yes, I did read it. I'd swear it had, at the end, that it was granted. My error but Wonder Why Aug 2023 #92

The minute orders are almost impossible to read off Xitter, really easy to misread. Ocelot II Aug 2023 #94

Jack Smith has filed a motion asking the Judge to reject the proposed three day delay LetMyPeopleVote Aug 2023 #83

This judge is not going to take any crap from TFG LetMyPeopleVote Aug 2023 #86

And she didn't, already. Ocelot II Aug 2023 #87

Right effing now! Nt ecstatic Aug 2023 #100