Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

raging moderate

(4,317 posts)

3. Yes. He is called the President. His job is to PRESIDE.

Reply to Rebl2 (Reply #2)

Thu Apr 25, 2024, 11:06 PM

Apr 25

The President is NOT supposed to RULE the United States. He is supposed to PRESIDE over the functioning of the executive branch of the United States government. He does not have a divine right of kings (which even the King of England does not have, by the way). He is NOT a RULER.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

If the president needs immunity, why not immunity for judges? Or congresspeople? [View all] unblock Apr 25 OP

Both already have immunity. If judges didn't have immunity for marybourg Apr 25 #1

Here's a long list of federal politician convicted of crimes: unblock Apr 26 #4

I don't understand what that has to do with my post marybourg Apr 26 #5

Donnie and the right wing justices seem to be angling for far broader immunity unblock Apr 26 #6

I see. marybourg Apr 26 #7

Time for Rebl2 Apr 25 #2

Yes. He is called the President. His job is to PRESIDE. raging moderate Apr 25 #3

Absolutely correct!!! Rebl2 Apr 26 #8